Wednesday, 6 May 2015
Why would anyone do that?
If you havent heard it I recommend the World At One programme broadcast 5/5/2015 which covers child sexual abuse allegations from 40 years ago and the involvement of politicians. It also explains why the broadcast media refuse to cover these stories, as their internal rules require two witnesses. It is on iPlayer at World at One starting at 27.5 minutes in.
Rather more significantly to my mind however is that the parties were photographed and filmed. Even the presenter queries the claim of being photographed and filmed, and why the abusers would allow it given the potential consequences for them. The victim showed the evidence of photos he had found with him in it. The former head of the metropolitan police paedophile unit confimed that it probably was the victim in the photo.
Why would important public people like politicians allow themselves to be recorded in illegal and career destroying acts? It makes no sense unless they believed they were invulnerable. If they really believed they could and would be protected and the evidence would never be made public. That is the chilling aspect from a public safety and order perspective. People in very senior positions must have been active in covering up and suppressing evidence of what was happening. As the victim in the piece says he was given the strongest of warnings what would happen to him if he went public or informed. Again something that would require at the very least collusion from senior people.
Once that sort of evidence exists, whoever has control of it also has leverage. The threat of it being released or leaked would be enough to ensure compliance in lesser criminal or illegal acts. The evidence and knowledge of what someone has done then becomes a currency in itself, something that can be traded for influence and protection in other matters.
The World at One series continues today. But be warned; what is described happening in the UK it not unique and the evidence is the modus operandi of these evil people in using knowledge, recordings and evidence for power is similar everywhere it occurs.
Labels:
abuse,
child abuse,
politics
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
We have to remember that child abuse was viewed as something almost trivial by the legal system. Never forget that in 1982 Geoffrey Prime confessed to molesting young girls, and was subsequently discovered to have been spying for the Russians. He was sentenced to 38 years in jail: three for the child sex offenses and 35 for spying. Could you possibly see that happening today? I couldn't.
ReplyDeleteHello James. You are right about the legal system's perception historically. However that is different from the public view - quite important for a politician. It doesn't seem to explain the stupidity of creating evidence by way of photos and filming. That would still have been sufficient to end a career I think.
Delete